You Have More Time Than You Think
How to lower the bar and play the long game in art and life
Somewhere between starting and now, you began keeping score.
You should have more followers.
You should’ve finished your album by now.
You should be closer to your dream life than you are.
Everyone else seems to be moving faster.
The comparison game is relentless.
And the thing about invisible timelines is that they feel completely real, until you stop long enough to realize you invented them.
We live in a culture obsessed with arrival.
With finish lines and milestones and champagne afterparties.
We build these mental maps of where we “should be” by thirty, or by next year, or by the end of the quarter.
And then we spend our days measuring ourselves against those imaginary deadlines.
But here’s what I’ve been realizing lately, and I’m realizing it because I’m living it:
The timeline you’re racing against was never real to begin with.
I’ve been releasing a song every four to six weeks for over a year.
It’s what they say you’re supposed to do…
Feed the algorithm. Stay consistent. Build momentum.
So I showed up.
Week after week, song after song.
But here’s the thing no one tells you about sharing work on a deadline:
At some point, you run out of runway.
I only have a few songs left in the tank.
And once those are gone, I’m writing from scratch to meet the next deadline.
That kind of thing keeps me up in the middle of the night.
Not because I can’t write.
I know I can.
I’ve been doing it for fourteen years.
It keeps me up at night because I know myself.
I know my standards.
And I know that when I sit down to write something new, I won’t settle for good enough just to meet a calendar date.
Which means I might miss the deadline.
And if I miss the deadline, I break the streak.
And if I break the streak, doesn’t that mean I failed?
That’s the voice in my head.
That’s the clock ticking.
But here’s what I’m beginning to realize:
The streak was never the point.
The algorithm doesn’t care about me. It cares about data.
And the people who care?
They didn’t sign up for a metronome.
They signed up because they want to hear my music.
If I take eight weeks instead of six to make something I’m proud of, the algorithm might snub me.
But the ones who care will wait.
Because they’re not counting the days. They’re listening for the truth.
So here’s what I’m doing.
I’m keeping the schedule.
I know that sounds backwards after everything I just said.
But here’s the thing:
The pressure to release every six weeks isn’t the problem.
The pressure is actually what keeps me making music.
It forces me to finish. And finishing is how I get better.
What I’m changing is this:
I’m lowering the pressure on perfection.
I might release a song that isn’t my best.
I might release a few bad ones.
But over time, the discipline of showing up consistently will produce better work than waiting around for perfect inspiration.
Because the real timeline that matters isn’t the six weeks between releases.
It’s the years of showing up.
The songs I release this year probably won’t define my career.
But the habit of creating under pressure, of finishing what I start, of trusting myself to keep going even when it’s hard…
That will.
And maybe that’s the reframe we all need.
We think we’re racing against the calendar.
Against our age. Against everyone else’s progress.
But the only timeline that actually matters is the one measured in decades of doing the work.
There’s all the time in the world, as long as you keep going.
Not because everything will work out perfectly.
But because the person you become by staying on the path is worth more than any milestone you were rushing to reach.
So if you’re measuring yourself against some invisible deadline, ask yourself:
What if the timeline is fake?
What if all you really need is the courage to keep going?
Because the truth is, you have more time than you think.
And the work you’re doing right now is building something that lasts longer than any deadline ever could.
Just keep going.
If you enjoyed reading this, the highest compliment I can think of is if you restacked it or shared it with one person who you think it would help.



I felt like you were speaking for me here, except I haven't quite hit that 'one song every 4-6 weeks' cadence yet. And when I run out of songs, I'll likely be in the same boat, worrying about hitting a deadline but not willing to sacrifice putting out a song that's just good enough.
I think you ultimately nailed it, though. It's about consistency, working at a pace that works with where you're at. And the right people will be there, not at all concerned about how long it took.
Glad to have found your publication!
Dave
You are spot on with this, Matt. Consistency means more than perfection. I have also learned that others see greatness when I doubt my work. Sure, it is not about what others think. However, what they think has allowed me to be less hard on myself and focus more on showing up than not being present.